We are the species that inhabits this planet with the most developed capacities.
Hundreds of millions of kings establishing common parameters for living in society under the protection of the theoretical certainty that science, politics, philosophy and ethics offer us on subjects as complex and basic as Life.

Pure dichotomy, with no nuances other than those of extremes and opposites. No grey. Only polarized concepts. Black or white. With me or against me. Many units of life allied in the same side. We create generalities about what is right and what is wrong, what is acceptable and what is not.

I don't think we are aware that in order to alienate ourselves we have simplified to a ridiculous, crude and tendentious extent fundamental and transcendental concepts implicit in the magnitude of what is actually our own existence.
Human inherent cognitive systems process thousands of pieces of data daily that require gross simplification, schematization and labelling.

In order to subsist, we compress and dilute elementary aspects that do not allow us to make a judgement, not even close to objectivity. Each of us has the responsibility to improve these processes of analysis and judgement with a conscious and less complacent attitude, even if, on the way, we have to be critical and crudely objective with ourselves.

I propose and explore dialogues between Art, Science, Technology, Ethics and Philosophy from a multimedia point of view and without tying myself to any format of work production... that is my aim.

My research is based on a subjective analysis of the bases that support the great current paradoxes.
A personal reflection based on an internal debate about the past, present and future of our evolution as a species.
I explore and re-interpret through multiple formats and technologies a new path within contemporary art.
I reflect on the present moment and humanity's relationship with technology.

Accepting and assuming this reflection places us in the reality of a new present, in which, for me, we are obliged to open a profound and sincere debate on the conflict that is generated between superlative Humanism and the limitations of the individual.

I reflect on the impact and consequences of these new realities that are inexorably integrated into our societies through artistic expression using techniques, materials and technologies different from the usual ones in the world of Art.

I look for new visual and conceptual results without complexes or limitations from the treatment of new techniques of artistic production and from the respect to the results obtained in my experiments and sometimes... without complete control over the work.

In the 21st century, Life, for example, does not have a clear and consensual definition, neither from a scientific nor an ethical point of view. As the dominant species on the planet, we humans go through our ephemeral existence between a succession of chemical reactions and an immense sequence of reception and analysis of data with the main purpose of survival. In this almost infinite loop of receiving and processing data, we generate conclusions, value judgements and decisions of varying degrees of importance. To conclude that our judgement and agency is biased and constrained by the limitations of our cognitive systems is relatively simple. It is enough to understand that the information we process and with which we will later make judgements, establish theories and determine conclusions, is nothing more than the fruit of the basic collection of information from our data reception tools: sight, taste, hearing, smell and touch.

After many hours of study and analysis of the most important references published in the world of Biology, Genetics, Computation and Artificial Intelligence, the first lines of reflection arise: Would it be possible to find entities that meet the same parameters of what we know as carbon-based Life in alternative environments and imperceptible to human cognitive systems; Would it be possible that our perceptions and judgements would not be sufficient to identify these possible forms of life; How could the concept of artificial life affect the human race; How could the concept of artificial life affect the human race?

Looking deeper into the subject, the research leads me to distinguish two distinct and differentiated but confluent postulates.

Biology and Technology are heading in the same direction; towards the design of organic life using Computation as a tool, improving and amplifying what evolution by itself has been able to generate on the planet over millions of years, (tissue culture, amplification or reduction of physical and mental capacities, immortality, transgenics, creation of new species, etc.), and that which is heading along the path of.

"Biology and Technology are going in the same direction; towards the design of organic life using Computation as a tool, improving and amplifying what evolution by itself has been able to generate on the planet over millions of years, (tissue culture, amplification or reduction of physical and mental capacities, immortality, transgenics, creation of new species, etc.), and the one that goes down the path of total or partial hybridisation of the human being and his capacities.

Researching and testing formulas of artistic creation using technology and scientific trends creates a new and exciting scenario for all creators who work with new formulas of approach between public and art."